Blog Stats
  • Posts - 18
  • Articles - 0
  • Comments - 31
  • Trackbacks - 49

 

Where does WSE 2.0 fit into BizTalk 2004?

Over the next few posts, I'm going to explore where, and how, WSE 2.0 fits in with BizTalk 2004.  I know some of you are thinking, well, we have this wonderful WSE adapter that allows us to retreive SOAP messages and have all the (or at least some) of the benefits of WSE (WS-Addressing, WS-Policy, etc).  That's true, we do...  BUT, what happens if we want to receive messages over a transport other than HTTP?  Many times, in a SOA environment it is necessary to support guaranteed delivery.  This is not possible over HTTP.  WSE gives us the ability to define our own custom transports.  Therefore, from a WSE standpoint we could receive messages via MQ to support our guaranteed delivery requirement.  If we do that then we can't use the WSE adapter.

On my current project, I'm exploring ways of dealing with WSE compliant messages, without using the WSE adapter.  This of course will require development of a custom pipeline to deal with some of the things the adapter takes care of like handling the WS-Addressing headers, digital certificates, etc.  Another thing I'm exploring is implementing WSE pipelines inside of a BizTalk pipeline.  This allows you to add custom filters to the WSE pipeline through configuration...pretty powerful.  I'm not sure what the implications, if any, are however.

Stay tuned as I post my findings!!

Cheers,

Todd

  • Share This Post:
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Technorati

Feedback

# re: Where does WSE 2.0 fit into BizTalk 2004?

Gravatar Hurry up and post on this!

I would be very interested to see the results of your research as I am working on a project that requires the use of the SoapActor attribute which has effects on the setup of BizTalk port bindings and any WSE published orchestrations. Painful in the extreme! 9/23/2005 11:15 AM | JB

# re: Where does WSE 2.0 fit into BizTalk 2004?

Gravatar So have you managed to investigate.. saves me trying to do the same thing.. please inform or post 1/16/2006 8:08 PM | Hits

# re: Where does WSE 2.0 fit into BizTalk 2004?

Gravatar I have a very specific question about Biztalk 2004 and WSE 2.0. If you have come across the following in your research pls. respond:

How do I configure WSE 2.0 Filters for dynamic WSE 2.0 Send Port? Is there a configuration file? app.config in Biztalk solution? 4/7/2006 11:06 PM | Newbee

# re: Where does WSE 2.0 fit into BizTalk 2004?

Gravatar I am also evaluating the cost/benefit of using WSE Adapter v/s SOAP adapter with BizTalk 2006.
The scenario; external partner will be submitting message through web service to Biztalk.
The issue: compare pros of cons of two approach of implementing message security
1. Use Standard SOAP Adapter. And enable WebServices Calls over HTTPS for encryption and username/password in message field for authentication
2. Use WSE Adapter. And use WS_Security for encryption, authentication and digital signature 2/1/2007 10:55 AM | BM

# re: Where does WSE 2.0 fit into BizTalk 2004?

Gravatar Hi Todd,

Did you get this to work? Or has anyone else tried using WSE in a BizTalk pipeline component? 8/7/2007 3:57 AM | MJ

Post A Comment
Title:
Name:
Email:
Website:
Comment:
Verification:
 
 

 

 

Copyright © Todd Uhl