Charles Young

  Home  |   Contact  |   Syndication    |   Login
  186 Posts | 64 Stories | 471 Comments | 373 Trackbacks

News

MVP - Microsoft Most Valuable Professional

Twitter












Article Categories

Archives

Post Categories

Image Galleries

Alternative Feeds

BizTalk Bloggers

BizTalk Sites

CEP Bloggers

CMS Bloggers

Fun

Other Bloggers

Rules Bloggers

SharePoint Bloggers

Utilities

WF Bloggers

While I'm on the subject of rules engines (which seem to be my main blogging topic currently), I should report that during the last two or three weeks, I took the plunge and expanded (rather a lot) the Wikipedia article of the Rete algorithm.   See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rete_algorithm.     Originally, I used the text of an explanation I wrote a year or so ago.   I got some kickback on that, with claims of inaccuracy and other claims that the text was too convoluted (what, me write convoluted content - impossible!).   The original text wasn't inaccurate, but it was less comprehensive than it should have been, and lacking clarity in places.  I spent some time last week extensively re-writing and expanding it, and have published the new version.    I’m not sure it’s any easier to read, but it is more complete.  Rete is a specialist subject, but if you are interested in how rules engines like MS BRE work internally, and specifically how they approach the problem of doing efficient combinatorial pattern-based matching of facts to rule conditions, then take a look.   I've added in links to other Wikipedia articles, and I plan at some point to add a few more diagrams.   Being Wikipedia, of course, anyone is free to alter, extend, re-write or even delete the content, so if you're also a Rete-head, please feel free.

Previously posted at http://blog.solidsoft.com/blogs/charles_young_mvp_biztalk/default.aspx
posted on Thursday, November 02, 2006 8:09 AM

Feedback

# re: Wikipedia article on Rete 11/3/2006 3:44 AM Peter Lin
You've definitely improved it and made a significant improvement. Don't mind back seat drivers like myself, who are too lazy to actually update wikipedia :)

to be blunt, I'm not sure any change I could make would be readable. I've been told by close friends i often sounds like noise.

# re: Wikipedia article on Rete 11/3/2006 9:31 AM Charles Young
Thanks Peter. Your comments are always appreciated. Congratulations on the new job, by the way. 70 hour weeks on rules! My wife would kill me.

# re: Wikipedia article on Rete 11/3/2006 5:13 PM Peter Lin
Luckily for me, my wife is very understanding. I make it up with exquisite chinese dishes. It's a good thing I'm married, otherwise I doubt there would be any chance of me procreating.

Post A Comment
Title:
Name:
Email:
Website:
Comment:
Verification: