Software Testing

HP Quality Center 10 from a Test Manager’s Perspective

Siva — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:47:26 GMT

Very informative article on HP Quality Center 10. dont miss the comments at the end, which gives very useful information.

http://www.beteoblog.com/2009/03/02/hp-quality-center-10-from-a-test-manager%e2%80%99s-perspective/

HP Quality Center vs. IBM Rational Quality Manager

Siva — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:22:30 GMT

Great article.

http://www.beteoblog.com/2009/04/20/hp-quality-center-vs-ibm-rational-quality-manager/comment-page-1/#comment-888

MSDN - Test Center

Siva — Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:00:32 GMT

Microsoft MSDN Launched "Test Center" : A community where software testers can share knowledge and learn from each other.

Black Box Software Testing

Siva — Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:49:00 GMT

The best testing course by Cem Kaner & James Bach

Automation Testing Vs Manual Testing

Siva — Fri, 04 Mar 2005 19:38:00 GMT

Sara Ford explores the difference of automated and manual testing and when to use which. A must read post. Click here to go

Bruce McLeod recently blogged in his opinion on the same subject, Read it

localizability, translation, localization, internationalization, and globalization

Siva — Fri, 04 Mar 2005 17:55:00 GMT

Find out the definitions of localizability, translation, localization, internationalization, and globalization by an excellent article posted by Larry Osterman. Don't forget to read comments too....

Tester's core function..

Siva — Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:49:00 GMT

http://blogs.msdn.com/shrinik/archive/2005/02/18/376096.aspx
via Shrinivas Kulkarni

Linux: Fewer Bugs Than Rivals

Siva — Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:12:00 GMT

Wired reports that Stanford is releasing a studying showing that Linux has 0.17 bugs per 1000 lines of code, where commercial software typically has 20 to 30 bugs per 1000 lines of code.

Source: http://www.testgeek.com/cgi-bin/blosxom.cgi/2004/12/14#BugCounts

Source Location: http://www.wired.com/news/linux/0,1411,66022,00.html

Repro This!

Siva — Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:15:00 GMT

A tester finds and logs a bug. Some days (weeks (months)) later a developer picks up the bug and runs through it. The bug does not occur. What should the developer do with this bug? We faced this type of issues several times. Using incremental build process this type of situation usually comes. What will be answer of the question “What should the developer do with this bug???” Go on and read the most common answer, less common answer and extremely rare answer for this question @ http://blogs.msdn.com/micahel/archive/2004/12/08/278330.aspx

Bridging the gap between black box and white box testing

Siva — Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:25:00 GMT

Excellent article written by Brain Bryson

http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/1147.html