Test Notes

I don't make software; I make it better

  Home  |   Contact  |   Syndication    |   Login
  68 Posts | 0 Stories | 22 Comments | 641 Trackbacks

News

  

Please Note
The information in this weblog is provided “AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. This weblog does not represent the thoughts, intentions, plans or strategies of my employer. It is solely my opinion. Inappropriate comments will be deleted at the authors discretion.


Google 

Groups
SoftwareTesting
Browse Archives at
groups.google.com



  Page Loads:

Technorati Profile

Click for Hyderabad, India Forecast

Archives

Post Categories

Image Galleries

Friend's Blog's

Groups

Sites

Testing Blog's

Wired reports that Stanford is releasing a studying showing that Linux has 0.17 bugs per 1000 lines of code, where commercial software typically has 20 to 30 bugs per 1000 lines of code.

Source: http://www.testgeek.com/cgi-bin/blosxom.cgi/2004/12/14#BugCounts

Source Location: http://www.wired.com/news/linux/0,1411,66022,00.html

 

posted on Thursday, December 23, 2004 12:12 PM

Feedback

# re: Linux: Fewer Bugs Than Rivals 12/24/2004 4:03 AM Kris Krause
What about the hidden bugs? What about the bugs no one knows about because no one is using the software?

# re: Linux: Fewer Bugs Than Rivals 12/27/2004 7:55 PM Scott Allen
Interesting study. Interesting in the sense that the linux code was analyzed while the commercial code was subject to vague hand waving about "defects are found frequently". Thanks for the link!

# re: Linux: Fewer Bugs Than Rivals 2/13/2005 5:05 AM Computer software review
Thanks! I'm almost recovered, I've been in bed for 1,5 month, and now happy to walk and work :)

Post Feedback

Title:
Name:
Email: (never displayed)
Url:
Comments: 
Please add 6 and 6 and type the answer here: