Test Notes

I don't make software; I make it better
posts - 78 , comments - 60 , trackbacks - 616

My Links

News

  

Please Note
The information in this weblog is provided “AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. This weblog does not represent the thoughts, intentions, plans or strategies of my employer. It is solely my opinion. Inappropriate comments will be deleted at the authors discretion.


Google 

Groups
SoftwareTesting
Browse Archives at
groups.google.com



  Page Loads:

Technorati Profile

Click for Hyderabad, India Forecast

Tag Cloud

Archives

Post Categories

Image Galleries

Friend's Blog's

Groups

Sites

Testing Blog's

FAIL

There are 3 entries for the tag FAIL
Test Driven Development proves useful at Google
Source: http://weblogs.asp.net/rosh... This is a session from the recent Developer Testing Conference. The lecture was about Developer Testing in Google and this is only part of it: Sriram Sankar, who received his Ph.D. at Stanford. Sriram is now at Google in charge of Developer Testing. Here is the Sriram's Lecture on "Developer Testing in Google" Google is building very sophisticated products, with complex cutting edge technologies, never tried before algorithms, ......

Posted On Friday, December 3, 2004 1:46 PM | Comments (5) | Filed Under [ Agile Testing Practices ]

Investing in Software Testing
What Does Quality Cost? The title of Phil Crosby book says it all: Quality Is Free. Why is quality free? Like Crosby and J.M. Juran, Jim Campenella also illustrates a technique for analyzing the costs of quality in Principles of Quality Costs. Campenella breaks down those costs as follows: Cost of Quality = Cost of conformance + Cost of nonconformance Conformance Costs include Prevention Costs and Appraisal Costs. Prevention costs include money spent on quality assurance tasks like training, requirements ......

Posted On Monday, October 27, 2003 8:33 PM | Comments (6) | Filed Under [ Quality Software Testing Risk Management ]

Manual or Automated?
Summary:Automated test tools are powerful aids to improving the return on the testing investment when used wisely. Some tests inherently require an automated approach to be effective, but others must be manual. In addition, automated testing projects that fail are expensive and politically dangerous. How can we recognize whether to automate a test or run it manually, and how much money should we spend on a test? When Test Automation Makes Sense Let’s start with the tests that ideally are automated. ......

Posted On Monday, October 27, 2003 8:27 PM | Filed Under [ Automated Testing Software Testing ]

Powered by: