News

Tweets












Time flys when you're having stress.

Hard to believe I haven't posted in a year.  I really intended to make this place a priority but a new job and life changes took over.

A great deal has happened in the SQL world in the last year and I must say that I missed most of it.  I have busily been working in a purely SQL 2005 windows 2003 environment without need to upgrade.  I think this happens to many DBAs.  You learn your systems, you tune your servers, business hums along and nothing earth shattering occurs.

When a new version of the DBMS comes out there must be a compelling reason to upgrade.  In fact the time required to investigate, test, and deploy the new version is usually a deterrent to upgrade.  You don't have the time or resources to change.  These are the things that make the new release cycle for SQL difficult.  I know many companies that just recently went to 2005 from 2000.  Never mind that they ignored 2008 and that 2008 R2 wasn't even on their radar. 

I guess the question for us all is this.  How do I stay current in the DBMS version when I can't keep up with the pace of Microsoft development due to my business's requirements?   How can Microsoft understand my needs with their heads in the cloud?

S2

 

 

 

Here goes nothing..who is Susan?

I will be the first to tell you that I don't think of myself as a writer.  Instead I think of myself as a geek and a gardener.  I will save you from my dissertation on the best food for hostas and will try to keep on track in this blog.  I will stick to the geek topics as best I am able.

A little about me:  I have been working with SQL server since 1994,  Version 4.21a to be specific.  Prior to my dive into this new technology I was a mainframe DBA, working with IMS, DB2, and Sybase.  This new DB technology was disturbing.  First I had to use a mouse,  which I loathed and 2nd if a mouse spasm occured code might execute.  It didn't seem like a real database to me and it would prove me right in many ways.  However, the idea of having a database on a NT platform fascinated me so I was hooked. 

I suffered through the corrupt databases, the NT upgrades and the SQL upgrades to see this platform and DBMS become an enterprise worthy platform.  (During the 7.0 to 2000 cluster upgrades my coworkers declared me a Jinx and I had to leave the server floor until the clusters came back up! Superstition runs rampant during upgrades.  :) ) 

Many times I had folks tell me that this DBMS was a waste of my career and that I should move to the Unix databases but I stuck with this and it has been an interesting ride. 

Anyway I am a huge fan as well as a deep critic of this technology and I hope to share some of my thoughts from both sides in this blog. 

If you are reading this.  welcome. 

If I am alone here I will continue without noticing. 

Sometimes the best audience can be you.  :)