<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>Nicholas Zurfluh</title>
        <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/Default.aspx</link>
        <description>blog</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Nicholas Zurfluh</copyright>
        <managingEditor>nick@networkage.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 0.0.0.0</generator>
        
        <item>
            <title>A Clean up routine for bigip.conf</title>
            <category>F5 networks</category>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2007/02/21/106936.aspx</link>
            <description>Here is a neat trick I stumbled across while doing some Stream Editing.

Here is a command that will remove all tabs and spaces before a new line.
sed -e 's/[&lt;insert tab here&gt;]*$//' -e '/^$/ d'
(This command is yet untested)

This should reduce those extra characters from causing the b load command to fail.
 &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/106936.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2007/02/21/106936.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/106936.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2007/02/21/106936.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/106936.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/106936.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Keyword Marketing</title>
            <category>Marketing Consulting Services On-line</category>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2006/08/28/89527.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;P&gt;I have found my initial foray into online marketing to be less than successful. It is odd what words people choose to find things online. The most obvious keywords do not neccessarily result in the most clicks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I recall a book I read entitled &lt;A href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0446520942/sr=8-1/qid=1156785985/ref=pd_bbs_1/002-4410356-2390450?ie=UTF8"&gt;Selling the Invisible&lt;/A&gt;, I highly recommend for anyone who sells consulting services.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After all of my efforts crafting the advertisements and honing keywords I have recieved only one click. For all that work, it didn't even result in a conversion. Fortunately, as an engineer, I don't give up easily.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/89527.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2006/08/28/89527.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/89527.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2006/08/28/89527.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/89527.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/89527.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>In case I forget again...</title>
            <category>F5 networks</category>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2006/06/28/83487.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;P&gt;OpenSSL is a usefull tool for trouble shooting issues with BIG-IP. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The sytax for creating a client connection is as follows: &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=Arial&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;openssl s_client -connect&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;EM&gt;hostname&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;port&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/83487.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2006/06/28/83487.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/83487.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2006/06/28/83487.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/83487.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/83487.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Big-IP Version 9.0.5 - syslog-ng remote logging</title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2005/06/07/42492.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=Arial&gt;F5 has given me a sample configuration for the /etc/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.conf&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=Arial&gt;Here is what you should add to the file for logging to a remote &amp;#8220;loghost&amp;#8220;.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;destination&amp;nbsp;loghost {&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; udp ("remote_ip_of_server");&lt;BR&gt;};&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;log {&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; source(local);&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; destination (loghost);&lt;BR&gt;};&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/42492.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2005/06/07/42492.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2005 23:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/42492.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2005/06/07/42492.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/42492.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/42492.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Log Roller</title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2005/06/06/42275.aspx</link>
            <description>My clients often request to use a syslog server for security notifications. It would be my preference to do this with Web services. In the mean time I will have to make due with syslog. Here is a page with a canned script for log rolling.

 http://www.afp548.com/article.php?story=20040916181619888 &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/42275.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2005/06/06/42275.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/42275.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2005/06/06/42275.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/42275.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/42275.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Correct the time with Big-IP ver. 4.5.9x</title>
            <category>F5 networks</category>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/11/01/14185.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;P&gt;Simple technique to correct the date/time of a Big-IP.&amp;nbsp; F5 will tell you to take your unit into single user mode, this is not neccessary.&amp;nbsp; I have discovered that you can update the time&amp;nbsp;of an&amp;nbsp;&lt;U&gt;standby&lt;/U&gt; unit in multiuser mode.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can update the clock in multiuser mode with ntpdate.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Syntax: ntpdate -b (time server IP/FQDN)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Manual page for ntpdate: &lt;A href="http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/ntpdate.html"&gt;http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/ntpdate.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/14185.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/11/01/14185.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2004 19:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/14185.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/11/01/14185.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/14185.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/14185.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>NIST official publication</title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/12/08/17087.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;P&gt;Some light reading, next time I want to deploy NTP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq/general/pdf/1383.pdf"&gt;http://www.boulder.nist.gov/timefreq/general/pdf/1383.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/17087.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/12/08/17087.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 01:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/17087.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/12/08/17087.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/17087.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/17087.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Big-IP ver. 4.5.9 ECV of Siteminder protected sites</title>
            <category>F5 networks</category>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10910.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;P&gt;What are the criteria that constitutes meaningful ECV.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Would this be a page match for an authenticated user session?&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If&amp;nbsp;a simple content match on the home page&amp;nbsp;is our goal it would require that we authenticate through Siteminder or thwart it.&amp;nbsp; Given, my understanding of Siteminder a script that authenticates a user would require an extended application verification script.&amp;nbsp; This aproach would exceed our ECV requirements.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;An alternative would be unprotect a page (if there is such an ability) have Big-IP issue a get request and thwart the authentication.&amp;nbsp; This would not tell us if the Siteminder elements are working and there could be a scenario where Big-IP can retreive a page that a user cannot authenticate.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What if a Siteminder&amp;nbsp;referal response&amp;nbsp;is good enough to consider a service available?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This can be done with a http v.1.1 request:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;GET /index.html HTTP/1.1&lt;BR&gt;Accept: */*&lt;BR&gt;Accept-Language: en-us&lt;BR&gt;Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate&lt;BR&gt;User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0)&lt;BR&gt;Host: &lt;A href="http://www.yoursite.com"&gt;www.yoursite.com&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;Connection: close&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The recieve string could be:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://smntlm.yoursite.com/siteminderagent/ntlm/creds.ntc?CHALLENGE=&amp;amp;TARGET=$SM$http"&gt;http://smntlm.yoursite.com/siteminderagent/ntlm/creds.ntc?CHALLENGE=&amp;amp;TARGET=$SM$http&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/10910.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10910.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2004 22:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/10910.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10910.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/10910.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/10910.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>enable SNMP queries in Big-IP ver. 4.5.9</title>
            <category>F5 networks</category>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/29/11898.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;P&gt;If you put a 32 bit&amp;nbsp;host mask (255.255.255.255)&amp;nbsp;in your SNMP client allow list (hosts.allow) Big-IP will not respond.&amp;nbsp; You must remove the host mask and leave an empty value unless&amp;nbsp;your client is a network&amp;nbsp;address &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;example: 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/11898.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/29/11898.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/11898.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/29/11898.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/11898.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/11898.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Changing time in Big-IP 4.5.9 and BSD</title>
            <category>F5 networks</category>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/29/11897.aspx</link>
            <description>Normally with BSD you are required to go into single user mode prior to changing the time.&amp;nbsp; I have discovered that you can use ntpdate to correct the time in multi-user mode&amp;nbsp;(A.K.A. init level 2). &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/11897.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/29/11897.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/11897.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/29/11897.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/11897.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/11897.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Poor man's Telecine</title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/13/11088.aspx</link>
            <description>I found an excelent site that details various &lt;A href="http://truetex.com/telecine.htm "&gt;attempts at telecine&lt;/A&gt;. It is quite remarkable to see the result of the images produce by using a microscope and camera combination. I have used several of the devices that are featured from the site, so, I can relate to some of the authors challanges. One thing that has always troubled my film scanning endeavors are the moving parts. Either the device moves the film or the scanner moves a CCD. The quality of the image is limited, in part, to the accuracy of the movement. The microscope/camera technique seems to over come the moving CCD, assuming that the image is properly positioned at the time of the capture. &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/11088.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/13/11088.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/11088.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/13/11088.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/11088.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/11088.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>iRule that limits portal console access </title>
            <category>F5 networks</category>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10913.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;P&gt;Here are the requirements:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Exclude access, to either HTTP requests that contain&amp;nbsp;/portal/console in the URI or&amp;nbsp;from among&amp;nbsp;deemed&amp;nbsp;suspicious&amp;nbsp;variables,&amp;nbsp;from all&amp;nbsp;client requests&amp;nbsp;other than those who's source address is from&amp;nbsp;internal address space.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;***UNTESTED***&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;rule &lt;EM&gt;server_lock_down&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp; {&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;if (http_uri matches_regex "/portal/console" and not one of internal_network_class) {&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; redirect to "&lt;A href="http://%h"&gt;http://%h&lt;/A&gt;"&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;}&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; else if (http_content contains one of bad_variable_class and not one of internal_network_class) {&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; redirect to "&lt;A href="http://%h"&gt;http://%h&lt;/A&gt;"&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; }&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; else {&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; use pool&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;x&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; }&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;} 
&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/10913.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10913.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2004 23:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/10913.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10913.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/10913.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/10913.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>iRule that identifies LDAP v.2 read and write requests</title>
            <category>F5 networks</category>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10904.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;P&gt;The issue is Vignette&amp;nbsp;makes LDAP v.2 requests that are load balanced to a Master and Consumer, Sun Java System Directory Server 5.2.&amp;nbsp; I must parse the&amp;nbsp;transactions to identify &amp;#8220;read&amp;#8220; and &amp;#8220;write&amp;#8220; requests.&amp;nbsp; Read requests may be sent to either servers, while the write requests must be sent only to the Master LDAP server.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Read&lt;/STRONG&gt; request redirected to&amp;nbsp;Master or Consumer LDAP&amp;nbsp;server:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;SearchRequest&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;CompareRequest&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Write&lt;/STRONG&gt; requests forwarded to&amp;nbsp;Master LDAP server:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;ModifyRequest&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;AddRequest&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;DelRequest&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;ModifyDNRequest&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Operations common to both Master and Consumer LDAP servers:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;BindRequest&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;UnbindRequest&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;AbandonRequest&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;ExtendedRequest&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/10904.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10904.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2004 21:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/10904.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10904.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/10904.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/10904.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How Windows Media Services Works</title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10915.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;P&gt;Here are the details of the &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/standard/proddocs/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/standard/proddocs/en-us/wmserver/understandingfirewallsandprotocols.asp"&gt;protocols&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Protocol &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/standard/proddocs/en-us/Default.asp?url=/resources/documentation/WindowsServ/2003/standard/proddocs/en-us/wmserver/howprotocolrolloverworks.asp"&gt;rollover&lt;/A&gt;: How the server discovers the best protocol to initiate the stream.&lt;/P&gt;Windows 2000 &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/en/server/help/default.asp?url=/windows2000/en/server/help/ns_admin_tool_ivqk.htm?id=4277"&gt;explaination&lt;/A&gt; of MMS with client side firewall. &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/10915.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10915.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2004 23:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/10915.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10915.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/10915.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/10915.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>The origins of the Web</title>
            <category>F5 networks</category>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10914.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;P&gt;As it turns out Vannevar Bush&amp;nbsp;didn't coin the phrase hypertext&amp;nbsp;although he lays out the concepts of the web in his collumn &amp;#8220;&lt;A href="http://www.ps.uni-sb.de/~duchier/pub/vbush/vbush.shtml"&gt;As We May Think&lt;/A&gt;&amp;#8220; for the Atlantic Monthly. Clearly a brilliant visionary, he even considers the problems we now face with i/o devices and logical abstraction. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Of note, it seems that Vannevar was a logical positivist, it is intersting to see the dillema that has resulted in a now post modern world that, in large part,&amp;nbsp;is sceptical&amp;nbsp;in regards to truth.&amp;nbsp; The pressuppositions of this article assume that facts would be the overriding drive behind the choices of ones logical progression. &lt;/P&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/aggbug/10914.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Nicholas Zurfluh</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10914.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2004 23:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/10914.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/archive/2004/09/09/10914.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/comments/commentRss/10914.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/nzurfluh/services/trackbacks/10914.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
