I am leading a mid size development team of 15 members. Recently I had to put grades on them to facilitate future assignments on projects. Just thought I could share those grade points, so that you have a quick asses!
|
Grades
|
Level
|
Comments
|
|
A+
|
Outstanding
|
Fully fitted for enterprise level leadership and architecture.
|
|
A
|
Excellent
|
Can be a core contributor in architecture for enterprise level projects.
|
|
B+
|
Very Good
|
Excellent implementer of the architectures for enterprise level projects defined by others. Can take leadership (architecture and management) for mid range application.
|
|
B
|
Good
|
Nice implementer for mid range projects.
|
|
C+
|
Satisfactory
|
Moderate implementer for mid range projects. Can be assigned small projects fully.
|
|
C
|
Better than poor
|
Requires a close guidance for coding tasks. Can be a good tester in code level.
|
|
D+
|
Poor
|
Not reliable for coding. Can be assigned for UI level fine tuning, technical documentation, deployment.
|
|
D
|
Non-satisfactory
|
Can't be a direct part in the team. Requires continuous training and monitoring.
|