<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:copyright="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss" xmlns:image="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/image/">
    <channel>
        <title>Visual WebGui</title>
        <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/category/4328.aspx</link>
        <description>Visual WebGui</description>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <copyright>Guy Peled</copyright>
        <managingEditor>dudegizmo@gmail.com</managingEditor>
        <generator>Subtext Version 0.0.0.0</generator>
        <item>
            <title>6.3.11 released with important fix for VWG designer</title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/10/19/135546.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="" href="http://www.visualwebgui.com" target="_blank"&gt;Visual WebGui&lt;/a&gt; 6.3.11 was released after we had a major breakthrough with an issue that had been with us from day one of the Visual WebGui designer. I guess most of you are used to reopening the designer after certain actions. You can imagine that we had sleepless nights thinking about this issue as we aim at perfection and this issue is far from being some thing you can live with. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue I am talking about is &lt;a href="http://support.visualwebgui.com/issue/ViewIssue.aspx?id=642"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; issue, which as its id (642) indicates is a long standing issue that has a few related issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The irony of it all is that all the hours spent on finding this issue resolves in simply deleting one extra disposing call. When renaming forms, changing certain parts of the code and some more places, Visual Studio requires the designer to reload and that simulates the closing and opening the designer but obviously not perfectly as one service required to be left between the first loading and the second one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new release is available for download &lt;a href="http://www.visualwebgui.com/tabid/110/default.aspx"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;here&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/aggbug/135546.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Guy Peled</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/10/19/135546.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:47:05 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/135546.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/10/19/135546.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/commentRss/135546.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/services/trackbacks/135546.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>New web development paradigm for ASP.NET Ajax Web Developers</title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/08/02/133862.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;I would like to direct your attention to an interesting article targeted for Web developers and more specifically ASP.NET developers who would like to learn a way to focus their development efforts on algorithms, requirements and business logics using a new, highly productive, boosted web development paradigm which provides maximal flexibility, interoperability and interactivity with any other web applications, controls set and architectures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article compares between traditional web development paradign represented by ASP.NET and a new approach represented by &lt;a href="http://www.visualwebgui.com"&gt;Visual WebGui&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To read the article click &lt;a href="http://www.visualwebgui.com/Gizmox/CIOs/WhitePapers/tabid/528/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/647/Visual-WebGui-for-ASPNET-Ajax-and-other-Ajax-Web-Developers.aspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/aggbug/133862.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Guy Peled</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/08/02/133862.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 14:43:22 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/133862.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/08/02/133862.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/commentRss/133862.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/services/trackbacks/133862.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Server vs. Client Empowered Web Applications</title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/07/16/133528.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;The following post is taken from an article that explore the differences, pros, cons and usages scenarios of the &lt;strong&gt;Server empowered web architecture&lt;/strong&gt; of &lt;a href="http://www.visualwebgui.com"&gt;Visual WebGui&lt;/a&gt; and on the other side the &lt;strong&gt;Client empowered web architecture&lt;/strong&gt; features by solutions such as Classic AJAX, Flex/Flash, Classic Silverlight, Java Applets.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both server and client empowered solutions can support any kind of UI look &amp;amp; feel using Silverlight or rich AJAX.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Client empowered applications support the highest performance in applications that data interactions are less common than pure UI/animations/media interactions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gaming, animations, and, most of the editors are not security critical applications so that client solutions are valid for those, however, server empowered solutions and more specifically &lt;a title="" href="http://www.visualwebgui.com" target="_blank"&gt;Visual WebGui&lt;/a&gt; is much more secured by design.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Client footprint is the parameter representing the download weight as a function of the application’s complexity. When client UI interactions, animations, and media are more common, and the software updates frequency is relatively low, then client solutions tend to be more efficient regardless their weight. However, in any other case the small &amp;amp; static footprint of Visual WebGui server empowered paradigm is much more efficient and reasonable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Client empowered solutions are virtually more scalable as they reduce mass responsibilities from the server. However, when the intensiveness of data interactions is higher than UI changes or heavy animations and media, Visual WebGui server empowered paradigm provides the best scalable and redundant solution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ull virtualization of the desktop environment i.e. Registry and File system is enabled within Visual WebGui server as a complementary service, providing full virtualization of desktop environment for web/cloud applications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Media, streaming and animations based applications, require the flexibility of Silverlight and Flash client based applications, the set of tools offered in this family of development tools is more graphic designer oriented and adapted. Visual WebGui server empowered paradigm with single layered object oriented code, desktop like form designer, point &amp;amp; click customization, and data designed set of controls, developer gains great advantage when developing data/business centric application. It simplifies and cuts about 90% of this kind of apps development time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maintaining single layered object oriented code is preferable in all cases than any kind of multiple layers and technologies. Even Silverlight which enables Dot.Net in the client requires the establishment of application .NET client &amp;amp; XAML infrastructures and .NET server code as data infrastructures in different layers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The same tools are available for web UI (DHTML/Silverlight) customization whether the architecture is client empowered or server empowered. However, customizing data controls and business functional UI is enhanced and boosted with the Visual WebGui server empowered paradigm point &amp;amp; click controls designer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sharing WPF/Silverlight XAMLs, code &amp;amp; resources may result in some level of presentation freedom (enabling the use of the same application from multiple devices and media). Though, the complete decoupling of Visual WebGui server empowered paradigm code from the presentation layer provides full capabilities to choose any device as an alternative presentation layer (plain browsers, Silverlight, Flash, mobile devices, smart clients etc).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.visualwebgui.com/Gizmox/CIOs/WhitePapers/tabid/528/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/615/Server-vs-Client-Empowered-Web-Applications.aspx"&gt;You can read the original article here...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/aggbug/133528.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Guy Peled</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/07/16/133528.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:28:36 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/133528.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/07/16/133528.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/commentRss/133528.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/services/trackbacks/133528.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>A Visual WebGui 6.3.8a fix released</title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/07/16/133527.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="" target="_blank" href="http://www.visualwebgui.com"&gt;Visual WebGui&lt;/a&gt; 6.3.8a was released today as a fix to the following issues of the Visual WebGui 6.3.8 platform:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VWG-5087 - IE-Button: The right-side border should be rendered in the correct position&lt;br /&gt;
VWG-4256 - Button with 21x21 image should not crop image with button size of 25x25&lt;br /&gt;
VWG-5091 - OpenFileDialog non-Flash should not throw JS error (while calling parent.Upload_CloseWindow())&lt;br /&gt;
VWG-5092 - OpenFileDialog non-Flash should not hang when OK button pressed&lt;br /&gt;
VWG-5093 - OpenFileDialog in Flash mode should not throw JS error while Obscuring active&lt;br /&gt;
VWG-5090 - OpenFileDialog non-Flash should show frames around the buttons&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.visualwebgui.com/tabid/110/default.aspx"&gt;Click here to download all 6.3.8a versions...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/aggbug/133527.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Guy Peled</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/07/16/133527.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:19:42 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/133527.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/07/16/133527.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/commentRss/133527.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/services/trackbacks/133527.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Visual WebGui 6.3.8 Released</title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/07/07/133308.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="" href="http://www.visualwebgui.com" target="_blank"&gt;Visual WebGui&lt;/a&gt; Web &amp;amp; Cloud platform version 6.3.8 was released today.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a further stabilization of 6.3.x that includes some resolved button behavior issues, as well as features such as Flash 10 uploading compatibility and the ability to configure a virtual directory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The full v6.3.8 change log can be found &lt;a href="http://www.visualwebgui.com/Developers/ChangeLog/tabid/605/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/624/Change-log-638.aspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.visualwebgui.com/tabid/110/Default.aspx"&gt;Click here to download Visual WebGui 6.3.8...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/aggbug/133308.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Guy Peled</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/07/07/133308.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:31:28 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/133308.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/07/07/133308.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/commentRss/133308.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/services/trackbacks/133308.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Visual WebGui Cloud-friendly technology</title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/07/06/133292.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;Being ASP.NET based &lt;a title="" href="http://www.visualwebgui.com" target="_blank"&gt;Visual WebGui&lt;/a&gt; is coded, parsed and executed on top of .NET and is most native application nature for Windows Azure, Amazon and other cloud providers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having an optimized received &amp;amp; sent data actually concludes in lowering the transportation and the costs when it comes to cloud deployment. The highest request-per-second compared to any other AJAX infrastructure proves the simple fact!, the CPU is much less occupied with allocations &amp;amp; disposals of objects and results again with lowering CPU usage and  the costs of  cloud deployment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The internally optimized support for application scalability and redundancy enables cloud applications to scale as much as needed seamlessly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having a mechanism that saves the smallest amount of data required for state persistence, results in keeping the amount of data transactions low as possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Visual WebGui's WinForms identical API and desktop compliant development patterns, and visual WebGui capabilities of supporting  desktop's richness on web  make it only natural to port desktop business centric apps to the cloud using Visual WebGui maintaining  the same UI without the need to completely restructure and rewrite.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can read more about the Visual WebGui technology &lt;a href="http://www.visualwebgui.com/Gizmox/Technology/tabid/619/Default.aspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and view the Visual WebGui Catalog sample running on Azure cloud &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://vwgcatalog.cloudapp.net/mainform.wgx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/aggbug/133292.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Guy Peled</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/07/06/133292.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:39:25 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/133292.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2009/07/06/133292.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/commentRss/133292.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/services/trackbacks/133292.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Tiny ASP.NET Ajax Framework Contest</title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2007/07/02/113644.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://netpl.blogspot.com/"&gt;Wiktor Zychla&lt;/a&gt; has assembled a tiny AJAX framework contest between Visaul WebGui, ASP.NET AJAX and Ajaxium. Comparing a givven scenario he checked bandwidth consumption, requests per second, etc. The results as Wiktor wrote them are: "The VWG is an &lt;strong&gt;undoubt winner&lt;/strong&gt;. It did a great job of serving the highest number of requests per second, 422, and is also a clear winner regarding the amount of data sent to and from the server."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h4&gt;Contest context&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More than two years ago we've built a small web application used to collect and print documents required to participate in secondary school final examinations in Poland. The application is used quite extensively by people from all over the country.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The application, &lt;strong&gt;maturzysta.vulcan.pl&lt;/strong&gt;, is located &lt;a href="http://maturzysta.vulcan.pl/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From the web developer's point of view there is one interesting aspect of the main form of the application: there are about 30 dropdown lists with complicated logic between their selections: when you change the selection in one list, few others should be cleared or repopulated with context-bound data. There is also quite a lot of validation of various dependencies between user's selections.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first version of the application was built as a &lt;em&gt;server-side &lt;/em&gt;application: all &lt;strong&gt;SelectedIndexChanged&lt;/strong&gt; events were auto-postbacked and processed on the application server. This caused a lot of trouble since the heavy form had to be sent to and fro the server.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The year later we've completely redesigned the application, moving the interface logic to the &lt;em&gt;javascript&lt;/em&gt;. The web traffic problem has been solved but two other appear. First of all - no one likes javascript, it's clumsy and error-prone. Then - we had to &lt;strong&gt;disable &lt;/strong&gt;ASP.NET page validation mechanism because otherwise the page content modified on the client-side would be rejected on the server-side as potentially dangerous.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the meantime, few promising AJAX frameworks appeared and we thought that it would be possible to go back to the initial version of the application but instead of expensive &lt;em&gt;postbacks &lt;/em&gt;we could take the AJAX approach and replace postbacks with &lt;em&gt;callbacks&lt;/em&gt;. This could solve all problems: reduce the traffic and still keep the application logic on the server-side.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="http://netpl.blogspot.com/2007/06/aspnet-ajax-framework-contest.html"&gt;Read more...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/aggbug/113644.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Guy Peled</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2007/07/02/113644.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:06:01 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/113644.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2007/07/02/113644.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/commentRss/113644.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/services/trackbacks/113644.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Added open source installation provides an easy way to work with VWG sources</title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2007/05/14/112492.aspx</link>
            <description>There is a new .NET2.0 open source package that comes with an  installation that enables to work with the open sources as you work with the  normal SDK. Working with the installed open source provides a quick way to fix  your own bugs and to contribute to the VWG community. You can see in &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://www.visualwebgui.com/tutorials/working_with_vwg_sources.html"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; web cast exactly what it means to start working with the  open source version instead of using the normal SDK. &lt;span id="spBody" class="Forum_Normal"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new installation will provide developers a real easy way  to better understand the VWG framework. You can even debug your project and  enter into VWG code which provides a great insight into the framework bits and  bites.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As always the sources can be found with in the projects section (&lt;a href="http://www.visualwebgui.com/Default.aspx?tabid=223"&gt;quick link&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/span&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/aggbug/112492.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Guy Peled</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2007/05/14/112492.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 12:55:34 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/112492.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2007/05/14/112492.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/commentRss/112492.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/services/trackbacks/112492.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Version 5.81.3.74.4d is available</title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2007/05/06/112289.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;p&gt;A new version has been released and it includes many bug fixes and lots missing functionality implementation mainly with in the DataGridView control. There are also lots of new features that had been requested by developers including redirecting, clipboard support, Invoking client side scripts, Calendar first day support, ListView auto resize and more. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DataGridView control has been added many missing implementations including selection management and events, deleting rows, resizing columns and rows, changing captions and visibility, alternative row style and more. You should be aware that previous versions of VWG had added the DataGridView control with lots of unnecessary definitions. While not harmful in the previous version, in the new one those different properties are working and could cause unwanted behaviors. You should clean up the InitializeComponent code from the different DataGridView definitions keeping only the positioning,dimensioning and data source attributes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are currently also working on a Vista theme that will be released soon. The site demo has already updated to work with the new theme. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For a more detailed change see the issue tracker &lt;a target="_blank" href="http://support.visualwebgui.com/Main.aspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As always you can download the latest version from &lt;a href="http://www.visualwebgui.com/tabid/110/Default.aspx"&gt;&lt;font color="#75808a"&gt;here&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/aggbug/112289.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Guy Peled</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2007/05/06/112289.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 01:21:33 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/112289.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2007/05/06/112289.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/commentRss/112289.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/services/trackbacks/112289.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Server based AJAX for enterprise applications – Solving the AJAX security issue and enhancing AJAX productivity and manageability </title>
            <link>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2007/04/29/112081.aspx</link>
            <description>&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; DIRECTION: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed"&gt;AJAX has been breaking new grounds almost every day, with over 150 AJAX frameworks, there are plenty of options to choose from and one might say too many. Most of the AJAX frameworks provide you with browser extension libraries that will help you utilize the browser and interact with the server in a more productive way. What they are trying to do in most cases is to provide larger building blocks to achieve your goals by abstracting the calls to the browser API and to the server. &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; DIRECTION: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; DIRECTION: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed"&gt;The last is a significant improvement over the plain vanilla browser coding but you are still writing your application in a very poor environment with very poor developer tools and your end result is a JavaScript application vulnerable in terms of security, manageability and your IP protection.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; DIRECTION: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; DIRECTION: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed"&gt;When you are writing enterprise applications which are actually business apps, the security, productivity, manageability and IP issues of AJAX development are becoming a real turn off. Applying SSL to your application can only bring you so far, as you are still exposing server services for the client to consume through plain old JavaScript and running business logic which can easily be hijacked using a simple script debugger. Also the different AJAX frameworks still in most cases force you to write your application mainly in client side JavaScript code which has its limits and productivity issues. The most obvious issue regarding JavaScript UI programming is lack of design time capabilities but that is only the tip of the iceberg.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; DIRECTION: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; DIRECTION: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed"&gt;Server based AJAX is a recent addition to the AJAX frameworks arena and it basically changes the way we think about AJAX applications. It introduces a concept of server based computing for web applications where your code runs entirely on the server and reflecting changes to the client. This concept is used widely in remote desktop or application streaming software, but has not been until now available for web developers.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; DIRECTION: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; DIRECTION: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed"&gt;The server based AJAX concept provides great benefits for developers in terms of productivity, manageability and usability. Currently the only available framework implementing full server based AJAX is &lt;a title="" target="_blank" href="http://www.visualwebgui.com"&gt;Visual WebGui&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href="http://www.visualwebgui.com/"&gt;&lt;font color="#800080"&gt;http://www.visualwebgui.com&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt; ) which provides full WinForms like API and design time capabilities for developing web applications. While it sounds very much like Google's GWT it is not, as it does not serialize the application code to JavaScript but rather uses it in runtime on the server and reflecting the UI to the client. This means that you have what can be called an "empty client" that is managed entirely by the server. Client events are sent to the server that in turn, return its update commands to the client reflecting changes made to the UI on the server. This process can be optimized in various scenarios explicitly to reduce the amount of server callbacks and bandwidth consumption, making the end result as responsive as standard AJAX applications.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; DIRECTION: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; DIRECTION: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed"&gt;There are some down sides to the server based AJAX concept, mainly in terms of scalability, as you are utilizing a server session to run your application but when applied to enterprise applications, rather then Amazon sized sites, you get a very nice ROI that you would not get in any other architecture. In terms of responsiveness and performance one would think that this concept lacks, but the opposite is the case, as the server uses fewer resources in terms of CPU and IO as it does not have to receive/return large blobs and most important does not need to construct and deconstruct the application classes on every request.  Also as said before there are many optimizations that can be applied to reduce server callbacks and bandwidth consumption.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; DIRECTION: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; DIRECTION: ltr; unicode-bidi: embed"&gt;The server based AJAX concepts may just be the solution for enterprise AJAX applications as it provides these applications with the best of both worlds. Having a responsive, rich AJAX UI that behaves pretty much like desktop UI, but still maintaining the productivity, IP protection, and security of running the application on server side provides a compelling offering for enterprises. &lt;/div&gt; &lt;img src="http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/aggbug/112081.aspx" width="1" height="1" /&gt;</description>
            <dc:creator>Guy Peled</dc:creator>
            <guid>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2007/04/29/112081.aspx</guid>
            <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 08:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
            <wfw:comment>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/112081.aspx</wfw:comment>
            <comments>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/archive/2007/04/29/112081.aspx#feedback</comments>
            <wfw:commentRss>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/comments/commentRss/112081.aspx</wfw:commentRss>
            <trackback:ping>http://geekswithblogs.net/gizmox/services/trackbacks/112081.aspx</trackback:ping>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
