Geeks With Blogs

@CaffeinatedTwit
  • CaffeinatedTwit It would also be nice if google added some sarcasm filters about 1780 days ago
  • CaffeinatedTwit "Singletons are evil" = 739,000 results..."Singletons are aewsome" = 384,000 results...Evil clearly wins. about 1780 days ago
  • CaffeinatedTwit @mpool Noob! You obviously haven't had enough practice when it comes to drinking at lunch. about 1792 days ago
  • CaffeinatedTwit Spent lunch at Borders working on a blog post for Monday. about 1793 days ago
  • CaffeinatedTwit I'm still in the mode where I'm trying to minimize the refactoring until I get the mocking framework more deeply integrated into our process about 1793 days ago
  • CaffeinatedTwit Just discovered the outref option in rhino.mocks. Opted to use that instead of refactoring legacy code to a return object this time. about 1793 days ago
  • CaffeinatedTwit First time posting on twitter in a couple of weeks and the update fails. Good to know things haven't changed much. about 1794 days ago
  • CaffeinatedTwit Overheard: Is there anyone I can talk to there who is having a better day than you are? (coworker to DMV worker) about 1794 days ago
  • CaffeinatedTwit Installing the final version of R# 4.0. Been getting lots of errors with the pre-release version I am using, so hopefully this will help. about 1802 days ago

Caffeinated Coder A Grande, Triple Shot, Non-Fat Core Dump by Russell Ball
The spoof blog The Secret Diaries of Steve Jobs has the best news summary of the recent debate over Microsoft's motivation behind releasing the source code for the 3.5 framework. It's concise, insightful, and most importantly hilarious. With all the animosity and paranoia constantly floating between Microsoft and the Open Source Community, I almost forgot that there is another rather large group that hates both the MicroBorg AND the freetards. As an aside, why doesn't Apple, or any other 3rd party vendors for that matter, ever seem to get criticized for keeping their code proprietary?

If you're interested in hearing some well thought-out alternative viewpoints on this topic, read these posts by Ayende and Miguel de Icaza. I agree with their desire to see Microsoft eventually loosen their proposed licensing agreement and legally allow for modifications and enhancements to the framework. The vast majority of developers would never take advantage of open licensing in corporate software shops because it would to the maintenance nightmare to have to reapply changes every time Microsoft released a hot fix or update. However, I do think that a few of the alpha-geek elite like Miguel and Ayende would come up with some innovative stuff if given the opportunity and both Microsoft and the rest of the developer community would end up in a better place because of it.

At the very least I hope that Microsoft is smart enough to realize what a public relations nightmare it would be if they ever legally went after the Mono project for any potential similarities in code. I am someone who quickly gets bored with excessive Microsoft bashing, but even I would turn my back on them in disgust if they did that.

In the meantime, I am going to bask in finally being able to step into the base class libraries with the Visual Studio debugger rather than having to rely upon Reflector or second-hand google detective work. Cheers to Scott Guthrie and the people who helped make this possible!
Posted on Friday, October 5, 2007 12:39 AM Musings, Rants, and Humor | Back to top


Comments on this post: Fake Steve Jobs 1, MicroBorg and Freetards 0

No comments posted yet.
Your comment:
 (will show your gravatar)
 


Copyright © Russell Ball | Powered by: GeeksWithBlogs.net | Join free