News

Locations of visitors to this page
    To Do: Blog 1000

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

 

 

Well, Saturday was, as my postal carrier called it, “Harry Potter Day”.  Unlike some of you, I chose to wait by the mailbox rather than be at the store at midnight.  Unlike the rest of you, I wanted to know what was going on before November 2008 (anticipated release date of HBP in theatres).

So, what did I think of it?  Well, it’s not quite as good as Prisoner of Azkaban or Goblet of Fire, but much much better than the disappointing Order of the Phoenix.  Also, at 652 pages, it’s a bit lighter than years 4 and 5.  But it’s definitely good enough that I want year 7 NOW!  :-)  The pace of the book seemed somewhat slower than some of her others, almost relaxed and casual until the last 100 pages or so.  Yes, what you’ve heard is true.  A major character dies.

At some point on this post, I will discuss that, but not without the typical spoiler warnings, so you can read on for a bit more, if you like.  I believe the identity of the fallen was trading rather highly on some of the boards discussing it.  Kudos to those of you who picked it right.  Personally, I haven’t been this surprised since the end of The Sixth Sense, or possibly since May 29, 1980 when I heard the voice of James Earl Jones saying “No, I am your father” to Mark Hammill.  The identity of the Half-Blood Prince will be nearly as surprising to some of you.  It wasn’t someone on my list last week, but I thought it was fairly obvious pretty early on in the book.

This is also an interesting book for our favorite bad boy, Draco Malfoy.  I’ve read other reviewers saying that they actually felt pity for him at some points.  I’ll have to reread it perhaps, but I didn’t feel that emotion on the first reading.   Yes, I know it’s a rough year for him, and having his father in Azkaban can’t be good, but he’s first and foremost a weasel, and it’s hard to have pity for weasels.   Potter’s a little slow on this story line.  I picked up on what was going on with Crabbe and Goyle almost instantly and he missed it entirely.  Perhaps I was just in the properly suspicious frame of mind.

So, what’s in the book?  The usual, Quidditch, The Daily Prophet, disagreements between Dumbledore and the Ministry of Magic, a quick stop at the Burrow and Diagon Alley, and, of course, Harry missing the Sorting Hat (I think Rowling must not like writing those scenes.  She keeps finding ways to have Harry miss them).  Many people will find chapter 2 particularly interesting, especially given what happens later, but I have my own thoughts on that.  We’ve spent the last two or three books learning quite a bit about Harry’s past and the history of his parents.  This book flips the coin on us and we learn quite a bit more about Lord Voldemort and his history.  The book cover is interesting.  I thought it was Dumbledore and Harry looking into the Pensieve, but it isn’t.  It’s an item in The Cave (chapter 28?).  Overall I found the book very enjoyable, but it didn’t have the tension in it that I’ve come to expect from the series.  It’s possible that I’m somewhat alone in that feeling, but I’ll wait to hear what others have to say.  I think that Rowling tries to lead us down an emotional path in this book, and if you’re willing to follow that path, the book might have quite a bit of tension in it.  However, I was not willing to follow that path.  A couple of books ago, I chose a different path, and I seem to be rigidly stuck on it, even now, when all apparent evidence points to me being on the wrong one.

UPDATE: Snog is a Brit slang term for kiss.  I heard it yesterday while watching the movie Wimbledon with my wife.  I either never heard it before, or ignored it previously.  The latter is more likely.  On another note, I've read comments to the effect that Chapter 2 is the best chapter that Rowling has ever written.  I wouldn't go that far, but it certainly is an interesting one.  Oh, and “The Cave” is chapter 26, not 28, as I wrote previously.  There are 30 chapters.
 

Okay, enough of that.  I’m going to talk about a few spoilers now.  I’m just going to use initials for the most part, as I don’t want the text of this page to appear in a Google search, but it shouldn’t be too hard to decode who/what I’m talking about.

 

***SPOILER*** ***SPOILER*** ***SPOILER*** ***SPOILER***


I’ll start slow, just in case that didn’t scare enough people away.

  • The stuff between HP and GW wasn’t very surprising.  I’ve been expecting that since year 2, and particularly since things with Cho went downhill.
  • Obviously, we’ve been expecting things between HG and RW to progress, and it’s nice to see that finally happen.  It’s not apparent whether there’s been any “snogging” yet (is that a British slang term or something that Rowling invented?  I’ve never heard it before, and it sounds almost lewd.  I prefer kiss.).
  • The identity of the HBP?  Well, gee, who’s really good at potions and Dark Magic?
  • Who the heck is R.A.B.?  The note doesn’t give us many hints, but it doesn’t appear to be a “good guy”.  Whoever it is doesn’t like LV, though, so maybe that’s good.
  • HP’s super-hero scene with GW at the end was kind of overdone.  “I can’t keep seeing you or my enemies will come after you.”  Is there a big S on his chest and I just missed it? Oh, that’s right, it’s just a lightning bolt on his forehead.  Hey, does that mean that he’s The Flash?
  • Will the school be open next year and will HP be back if it is?  These are obviously tied together.  In spite of HP’s words at the end, I think that if the school is open, he will be there.  This whole series is about HP’s adventures at Wizarding school, after all. I think that members of the O of the P will talk him into returning.  He’ll be sullen and frustrated, but he’ll do it.  Obviously, SS won’t be there, though, and probably not DM.  And will MM be the new head-mistress or will the M of M bring in someone new?  I suspect the latter, but I just don’t know.  This will frustrate me if he doesn’t go back, because if he doesn’t, I’ll probably never learn what N.E.W.T. stands for.  I’ll have to reread the other books and Rowling’s site, but I don’t think it’s ever spelled out.
  • OK, one last warning if you’ve read this far, and haven’t read the book yet.  I’m going to discuss the death scene, and you don’t want to know about it in advance.  Turn back now.
  • As I said, the death was stunning, but it was stunning to me on about page 560 or so, long before the death actually occurred.  That’s when I realized who it was going to be, and I had to put the book down for a few minutes and think about it.  As I have said previously, I didn’t find there to be much tension in this book.  Rowling was obviously setting us up for something and hinting that SS was going to betray AD.  That’s where the tension was supposed to be.  Would HP be able to stop SS?  Obviously, the answer’s no.  However, I didn’t find that plot-line to have that much tension in it.  Why?  AD trusted SS completely, and so did I.  And I still do.  How can I say that?  Because I trust AD’s judgment.  I think there are some hidden things going on in that scene on the tower, and here’s what I think they are.
    • Obviously, AD and SS had discussed the situation with DM and SS’s Unbreakable Vow previously. Remember AD telling HP that none of what he’d overheard between SS and DM caused him any “disquiet”.
    • AD did not want DM to kill him.  He still had hope for DM and knew that would push him over the edge.
    • AD did still want his “inside man” in the DE’s.  And he was aware that there were some DE’s that didn’t trust SS anymore.  Obviously, the DE’s being at H without SS’s knowledge could not be good for SS.  While killing AD was obviously the primary mission, I think it likely that killing SS if he showed any signs of being un-trustworthy was a secondary one.
    • AD obviously believed in the sacrifice of love and that there are people more important to the O of the P than himself.  He may haven’t even thought that he was getting too old to be as useful as he would’ve liked to be.
    • The final point in me still trusting SS is AD’s pleading tone at the end.  If all of what I have said above is true, then SS wouldn’t have wanted to kill AD.  But, AD knew it was necessary (to save DM and SS, and possibly others), and implored him to do it.  The death scene was not so much a murder, as a suicide.
  • Obviously, these are my opinions, and may be completely wrong.  We’ll find out in a couple years when book 7 is released.  Hopefully we can all wait that long.  Remember, we had a three year wait to find out what happened to Han and if Darth Vader really was Luke’s father.  I don’t think we’ll have to wait that long.

Now playing: Billy Joel - Say Goodbye To Hollywood

Monday, July 18, 2005 9:01 AM

Feedback

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I agree with you on the death scene. I thought the book was a *bit* slow in the middle, but overall I really enjoyed it. It seems to me it was quite a page turner for you as well, considering you finished it quite quickly. :) 7/19/2005 6:45 AM | Lance

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Thanks. I did enjoy the book. I think I'd rank it 4th among the 6, right above book 1, and far above book 5. That sounds like I'm ranking it low, but I very much enjoyed book 1 and even enjoyed book 5, for the most part.

As for the death scene, I've given it more thought and I'm even more convinced that I am correct.

Remember that AD believed that love and the things that go along with it such as trust and loyalty are what gives HP his strength and his advantage over LV. LV believes that AD was a fool to put faith in such things.

Therefore, if SS really betrayed AD, then LV is correct and HP is doomed. 7/19/2005 7:41 AM | Chris J. Breisch

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

N.E.W.T stands for Nastily Exhausting Wizarding Tests - just thought you'd like to know :) 7/22/2005 6:38 PM | matty

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

The book was incredibly slow and I did notice the lack in trust Hermione and Ron had for Harry. It felt as if this book was about pulling the pieces together and tieing up loose ends...the plot being fairly simple as it wasn't as adventurous as I would have liked it to be. Surprising is the fact that for the first time LV did not make an appearance himself and the more I think about it I would have to agree with you that SS is somewhat still trustworthy but HP will never forgive him. Funny it being that crucial info was given in the first chapters almost confusing me as SS was revealed to still be a DE-er. The book really picked up speed around 550 which was disappointing because then the pages following it came too fast when the rest of the book was so mellow and seemed to be packed with fillers. The books jacket was centered around those final chapters which kind of shows that the best part of the book was its end. Severly upset over the death...I mean who has Harry have now? Just his friends and if they go in book 7 then that will just be sickening. I'm a little rusty on book 5 so I think I need to go back and refresh on that since i read that one so quickly and so long ago I forgot a lot of it. Overall now I have to wait for book 7 and its gonna be a while...the last 2 books have been somewhat a disappointment yet still intriguing and definitely much much more mature---book 4 is my favorite though for its constant excitement. 7/23/2005 1:48 PM | Dj

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I also agree that the book started slow but believe it was very much worth it. I'm not quite sure what to think of SS now, it could go either way. But the more I hear about the view of AD wanting this ending the more I am inclined to think that you may be correct. At least thats what I hope is the case. I also will be extremely disappointed if Hogwarts does not open the next school year or if HP doesnt return.
Aside from that, I failed to see the romance between HP and GW before now. I thought GW just had a little "first year girl/big hero" crush and there wouldnt be any more of it. I think we all saw the HG and RW thing coming a LONG time ago though! =)
Over all, I loved this one just as much as the first, with the exception that I am very upset AD is gone. =( 7/23/2005 8:48 PM | Danielle

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

The age of a texbook eliminated someone from being the Half-Blood Prince. How, then, did [name omitted] end up being the Half-Blood Prince? 7/25/2005 4:38 PM | Gary

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Why are you guys saying #5 wasn't as good as the others, i thought 5 was one of top three!!!!

Please tell me why you guys think that 5 wasnt as good as the others????? 7/25/2005 8:56 PM | D.P.

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

well one reason #5 wasnt quite as good as the last ones was that half the book was harry (and his readers) serving his punishments from Umbridge. Also there was quite a bit less quidditch than the previous books. i am not saying i was dissappointed with the fifth installment, far from it, i thought the DA meetings more than made up for its lack of quidditch excitement 7/25/2005 11:45 PM | benji

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I think RAB is Sirius's brother Regilus (sp?). Though I am sure that Sirius said he dead, I am quite sure that it is not out of the relam of possibility that he would pull a 'Pettigrew'. 7/26/2005 11:10 AM | Jon

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Personally, I'm not all that fond of reading about quidditch - one of the reasons I liked books 5 and 6. Also, to answer Gary's question, books can be bought second-hand. We have some indications that Snape's family didn't have much money, so buying a used book certainly wouldn't be out of the question. Overall, I really enjoyed this book. The horcruxes are a terrific plot device - quite as good as the dementors, and I'm with those who believe that Regulus Black is our mystery character in Book 7. 7/26/2005 4:53 PM | Paul

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

NEWT's stands for nastilly exhausting wizard tests 7/26/2005 6:14 PM | Ben

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

As of what I'm hearing but just a rumor that maybe turn out true-was that Rowling herself did an interview around the time Prince was about to be released and hinted that AD might just happen to be back in book 7, now she didn't say AD but probably something about the character who passes away will make a return....it does seem slightly fishy how Snape just Avada Kadavra'd ( which by the way I hate that chosen name for the curse it reminds me of magic tricks of our world abra cadabra or something) and then just left with AD flying over the balcony. Maybe he split his soul? Most likely not since it was inferred only evil people do that--and it just seems so unlikely that SS could so easily kill AD. Somethings goin on here people! A lot of speculations gonna get going--any one know the projected release year of the final book? I hope its a thick one. 7/26/2005 10:43 PM | Dj

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I think AD is dead. His portait(s), I am sure, will have their say throughout HP7. But the bit about a character that passes away makes a comeback would dovetail nicely with the RAB. Sirius finds his way out of the Veil (in OFTP) and brings Regulus with him. 7/27/2005 10:36 AM | Jon

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Answers to several questions:

matty and/or Ben:
Thanks. Do you have a source for this info?

Dj:
Seems like you and I felt about the same about the book, although I thought this one was considerably better than book 5.

Danielle:
We're all upset about AD being gone. I wonder how active his portrait will be?

Gary:
Not sure who you're saying was eliminated unless it was LV. I don't believe that LV and SS were contemporaries at Hogwart's, therefore the age of the textbook would definitely eliminate one or the other (or both) from contention.

D.P:
I just felt like that other than the D.A. stuff, nothing happened in the middle of the book in 5. Nothing significant in lessons, no big events, just plodding along waiting to see how Kreacher and Black are going to cause trouble or waiting to see when Harry's going to stop feeling so sorry for himself. I would've liked 5 a lot better if it had been about 200 pages shorter.

benji:
I don't miss the Quidditch, although those are nice interludes. Will miss it in 7, if Harry doesn't return to Hogwarts.

Jon:
Good thought. Hadn't come up with that one.

Paul:
I agree with your thoughts on the Horcruxes...although this means that Harry's going to be quite busy in year 7. I envision something similar to 4, with all of his tasks

Dj:
It has to be out before mid-2008 or that will delay the film schedule. However, I'm hoping for a mid-2007 release. Rowling's said she's going to take a little time off to be with her newborn baby.

Jon:
Agreed. 7/27/2005 7:04 PM | Chris J. Breisch

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

The only person taht got eliminated for being the HBP was SB, JP, LP, cause HP thought maybe LP or JP had owned the book since he saw that JP used one of the spells on SS, and HG confirmed that the first owner of the book was Eileen Prince (SS Mother) 7/29/2005 11:18 AM | Edward

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I finished the book about 10 minutes prior to this posting and reviewed prior postings. I have to agree with most of what I see. I think book 4 was the most exciting and books 5 and 6 slower than what I like. I'm hoping that 5 and 6 are sleeper books (like episode 1 and 2 of the Star Wars saga) that end in a mind bending book 7. 7/29/2005 9:02 PM | philC

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Let me try this again. Books 5 and 6 I'm hoping are stage-setters....being slower in terms of tempo but vital in their content in preparation for the future and final Book 7. Given the remaining 4 horcruxes, the now renegade SS, and a dead AD, it would seem that HP is faced with and insurmountable task. Admittedly I'm not as avid a HP follower as most, but am certainly expecting a book 4-like tempo (and associated sleep deprivation) where HP lives, LV dies, and not sure what happens to SS. 7/29/2005 9:10 PM | PhilC

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

From the HBP we're told that the potions book has "This Book is the Property of the Half-Blood Prince" (Pg 193) scribbled along the bottom of the back cover in small, cramped handwriting. Harry later, after speaking with Lupin, looks up the publishing date and discovers that the book is nearly fifty years old (Pg 337). Hermione then discovers that a student named Eileen Prince attended Hogwarts (Pg 537) around that time, but the boys are convinced the HBP is male.

Later, Snape admits to being the HBP (Pg 604) and this is further solidified by Hermione's statement that Eileen Prince did in fact once own the potions book. Further, we are told that Eileen Prince was a pureblood witch who married Tobias Snape, a Muggle, and gave birth to Severus Snape (Pg 637). Thus, Severus Snape really is a 'half-blood Prince' who could have then used his mother's old school book (the family was rather poor) and written all over it.

Harry received the book from Slughorn who got it out of a corner cupboard with other used potions class books (Pg 184). Since this used to be Snape's potion's classroom, it's reasonable to assume that, after so many years teaching potions, he could have forgotten his old school book and it could have been put it in the stack of used textbooks at some point by himself or someone else.

In any event, from the above, it seems pretty clear to me that Snape is, in fact, the HBP as he claims. 8/3/2005 9:31 PM | Stephanie

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I believe snape always supported AD and the proof I believe is in the Book you all seem to hate which I loved which is OFTP one of Voldemorts most important missions, regaining the Prophecy is stopped by the Order however who alerts the Order to what has happened, Snape LV most trusted death eater does this strike anyone else as odd I think AD is either very much alive or very carefully planned everything.
8/8/2005 5:49 AM | Danny

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

For those of you awaiting the next movie, check out www.gobletoffire.com (11/05). 8/9/2005 6:36 AM | Jon

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I may be a little slow (dim witted even), but what is all this about identifying the HBP? I thought that is was pretty clear especially when SS said he was HBP. Did I miss some sort of intrigue.

The only mystery coming out this book is who RAB might be. I know I have said earlier that I think it is Regulus, but just on the off chance, does anyone know what the first names of Borgin or Burke (from the store Borgin & Burke's)? I am wondering that since they like collecting Dark objects and were "shafted" by LV once before, they seem to have some possibilities.

Thoughts???

8/9/2005 6:44 AM | Jon

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I think that at the very beginning when Narrcissa Malfoy was talking to Snap that Snape only went through with the unbreakable vow since NM was quite powerful and could have easily killed him. Also Draco was his favorite student he wouldn't want him to be blamed for the murder of AD, the man who trusted him so much. In the end AD had the strength and was wise enough to talk Draco out of what he was doing. Snape having the unbreakable vow then had to kill AD since he vowed to help Draco if he could not succeed. Therefore it was not Snape's fault for Dumbledores death because AD realized it was his life or Snipes. AD did realize he had lived his life and he had taught Harry so much that he knew Harry would be ready to take on Voldemort and finish this horrible time of war between good and evil.

I also have a bit of a question. If Mr. Mooney, Wormtail, Padfoot, and Prong are Remus, Peter, Sirius, and James. Then Remus is Mr. Mooney because moon hes a werewolf. Peter is worm tail because hes an animagus and turns into a rat, which has a tail that looks much, like a worm. Sirius is padfoot since his a dog and dogs have padded paws or feet. James is prong but that has never been explained. Why is James prong? Has this been explained in earlier books and I just missed it.

And in reply to Jon message 8/9/05 6:44 am, I agree that the guy from borgin and burks is a very high possibility. It just seems almost impossible that he could get something like that unless he had help from someone. Someone else who knew about the horcruxes. Someone like Lucious Malfoy one of the most important of the death eaters. He had the journal why couldn't he have the necklace as well. What was in that box he handed to the person at borgin and burkes in year 2 down in knockturn alley? It is possible that Lucious murdered this RAB character and Lucious took the 2nd horcrux isn't it. Lucious was also very loyal to Salazar slytherin meaning he would want the necklace for the dark lord. Which means he could also have it safe with him locked up in Azkaban so no one could get to it. It is also possible that he has the other horcruxes and he will keep them safe in Azkaban so Harry cannot find them. Voldemort will win the final battle and evil will rule the wizarding world and probably the muggle world as well. There will be no muggles, muggle-borns, or and wizarding family who is not purr blood will be murdered. Pureblood wizarding families will take over the world and it would be disastrous causing the ruler of the entire world to be lord Voldemort and his followers.
But this is only if Lucious has the horcruxes in Azkaban. If not Harry's pretty much safe and he can destroy the horcruxes and then Voldemort and then make the death eaters good again and then the world will be all happy and pleasant and no evil will every come again. But that would be in a dream world. So we will just have to wait and see what J.K. is going to write for Harry's last year at Hogwarts and possibly the last year of his life.
8/10/2005 7:13 AM | lindz

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

To lindz (8/10/2005 7:13 AM): Why the name "Prongs" was associated with JP was never discussed, but I am sure that it a reference to the antlers when JP became a stag. 8/10/2005 10:37 AM | Jon

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I was searching later on and found it is realated to his animagus form of a stag and the antlers. 8/10/2005 6:56 PM | lindz

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

couldn't Harry himself be the last Horcrux? As Voldemort was trying to collect things from all the four founders of Hogwarts and if its true Harry is the heir of Gryffindor... 8/17/2005 10:15 AM | ipnjar

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

harry is not a horcrux and about RAB i think is sirius brother 8/18/2005 10:25 AM | jtgy

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

how do you know Harry isn't a Horcrux? 8/18/2005 11:41 AM | ipnjar

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

If HP is a horcrux then LV would have been very clever.. as harry would have to be destroyed for LV to be destroyed? But as the prophecy says that doesnt harry have to kill LV? Ahh I'm beginning to confuse myself.

Does anyone know what Regulus's middle name is? I think it is very possible it is him. After all, SB stated that he was dead, as he was killed by LV himself. The books have revealed that LV only kills very important people, otherwise he has his followers do his dirty work. And as for AD, his death must have been planned. Would the greatest wizard of all time be killed by SS?
8/22/2005 7:56 PM | jor

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

R.A.B is regulas cause if u read book 5 they find in no12 ggrimmuld place a locket that no1 cn open.......... it must be the horcrux. Harry culd very easily b a horcrux it wuld fit the prophecy exactly "the dark lord will mark him as his equal" they wuld both ave 1/7 of his soul hence fofilin that part nd givin harry his parseltounge ect. "either must die at the hands of the other 4 neither can live whilst the other survives" if harry was horcrux it wuld work perfectly cause either he has 2 sacrifice himself (which makes him the only 1 hu can kill voldermort, like the prophecy sais) or voldermort has to sacrifice a part of himself 2 kill harry. i think its a perfet fit. 8/31/2005 5:01 AM | Catherine

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

in response to lindz, it is mentioned that JP is a stag animagus, harry wonders why his patronus is a stag, and tonks is a dog like creature only to discover that his father actually turns into a stag

I also agree with the possibilty of one of the borgin and burkes men being RAB. they were the first ones that i suspected... and, what if the necklace that nearly kills katie bell is it? just a thought

inpnjr: i also thought that harry himself could be a horcrux, but then, wouldn't that mean that harry would have to destroy himself? his task is to destroy all of the horcruxes in order to prevent voldemort from returning to power? maybe this is something to look into

didn't sirius say that voldemort had regulas killed not doing it himself? at least, that's what i remember reading 9/7/2005 2:19 PM | Sarah

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I've read all books 1 through 6....I read them over and over every night, when I finish them I start back at one...I have noticed that there are alot of clues that every one has missed..I check all the forums, every website thas has Harry Potter in it...Now I am not going to give out any of my clues, because it will spoil all the hard work you guys put into discovering the truth....But I will say that R>A>B> is not Regulas Black....He was killed because he wanted to quit being a Death Eater & He might be a Horocrux. I have found several clues as to why I believe that..Voldermort could not kill Black, He had to have some one else do it(he could not kill a piece of himself) Also Black's Mother reports to be grateful to give up her son to Voldermort to be of good use....(horocrux) Reason why Black did not want to be a Death Eater. I'm not saying you have to belive me, But I have over 25 clues about Regulas Black. I know they don't go into much detail about him, but I noticed they refer to him without using his name!!!!!! I can't wait til 7 comes out to prove my theory......Bye 9/17/2005 2:46 PM | still reading

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

R.A.B is a code not someone's actual initials. Regulus Black is dead as his brother said. The person who wrote the note probably would have been killed by TMR had TMR's body not been destroyed by the AV spell rebounding on him at the Potters. I think TMR would have known instantly that the locket was not the horcrux as his horcrux was not a locket at all. The locket thing is one of Rowlings efforts to confound the reader and send him on the wrong track. I think that some DEs, the ones who have not used the AV spell or sent folks insane, will turn on TMR as will SS. Harry can't be killed by TMR, only by his followers. It has something to do with Harry's eyes. Anyway book 7 should be interesting with giants, werewolves, DEs and the rest fighting it out. 12/12/2005 7:23 AM | Graeme

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I think Graeme is insane!. the fact that Regulas is dead it doesn´t mean that he couldn´t have stolen the Horcrux before he was murdered in order to cause any kind of damage to Voldemort, remember that he was trying to leave the Dead Eaters 12/22/2005 5:59 PM | Sebastian

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

i don't actually think Dumbledore is dead, i think Snape is still on Dumbledores side and he just wants Voldermoult to think he's dead, but i don't think he is. R.A.B is regulas Black, i think thats obvious, Unless its too obvious. I hope that at the end of the book, whoever Voldermoult or his follwers have hurt or killed will be alright again. i really hope that happens. Oh and by the way Dumbledore can do magic without his wand. so thats why i don't think Dumbledore is dead! 1/22/2006 7:44 AM | Lavender Brown

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Yall is all stupid. Duhhhhhhhhhhh? R.A.B is Regulas Black 1/24/2006 3:36 PM | Ahmad Elbella

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I think R.A.B. is Regulus Alphard Black too, Sirius Black's brother that he said died. Snape is still a good guy and is going to fulfill his debt to James. And now it is Pettigrew's turn to die... (Prong, Padfoot, Wormtail, Mooney... reversed order of their deaths) I believe that Harry will return to Hogwarts and Hermione and Ron will accompany him on his final capmaign. And maybe Dumbledore's Army will reassemble... Dumbledores portrait may or may not have a large roll in the the 7th book. Voldemort will definately die in the 7th but Harry might too. 3/28/2006 6:28 PM | Robbo

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Hi Folks. I am definitely convinced of what I'm saying here, trust me it is good. I notice that quite a few people are reading too much into the books, so I want to simplify things for you. First, RAB is Regulus Black, and the locket mentioned on page 116 of book 5 is the clue. Second, Snape is on the right side, and add this clue to what has been said already: on page 603 of book 6 he tells Harry that his spells are no use unless he learns to close both his mouth and mind. If you think carefully, doesn't that sound more like a helpful hint than a sneer as it first seems to be? A hint to help Harry prepare for what's coming up? Third, Harry is not a horcrux at all. That's utter nonsense. Fourth, the heir of Gryffindor is Dumbledore. As Gryffindor was one of the greatest wizards of all time, his true heir could only be one of matching greatness, both in intelligence and character. And while Harry has great character, his brain is no match for true geniuses like Dumbledore or Hermione. I find this the most logical and likely guess at the heir. 4/15/2006 12:55 PM | Mohammad

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

I think the death scene was disappointing.I mean why couldnt draco do it by himself!!! he should be killed.i mean anyone would of been more than happy to have something that important to do expecially given by you-kno-who.i think harry will retun to hogwarts wit ron and Hermione and they will continue the D.A since dumbledore in now where he belongs.I dont have a clue who R.A.B is tho cause R.A.B sounds like a good guy and everyone in the black family has been a death eater except for sirius.i think harry is a horcrux only because even dumbledore said this himself that when voldmort tryed to kill harry a part of voldmort went inside harry so they have a connection. thats how harry is able to talkto snakes and look inside voldmorts thoughts and mind.cause voldmort put apart of himself into harry. it all makes perfect sence now.but snape is a very good servent and is lucky and noble...........i do think that my master i mean voldmort will die along wit harry.AND PEROPLE NEED TO REMEMBER THAT VOLDMORT CAN KILL HARY AND HARRY DOSNT GOT ANYTHING PROTECTING HIM ANYMORE NOT SINCE NOLDMORT BUT HARRYS BLOOD INSIDE HIMSELF!!!all harry gots is his aunts and uncles charm that dumbledore casted. harry also cant be the hair of gryffindor cause his mum was a mudblood and his dad was a potter well mabe but james would of knew and said something to sirius or lupin so it dosnt matter. 6/5/2006 4:20 AM | Tierra

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Hmmm, does anyone else have any ideas on who said R.A.B. is, exactly? There have been many suspiscions of it being a one Regulus Black, who appeared to be Sirius Black's younger silbling. Sirius mentions that Regulus found out what Voldemort was really up to and tried to fly the coop, but the fact still remains that if this is the case, if he knew what Lord Voldemort was really doing, could Regulus, perhaps, have known about the Horcruxes? As it is, we are never told if Regulus's middle name started with an 'A', so we can not be positive, though the fact still remains that this is a rather logical guess. Also, I'd like to point out that R.A.B. knew he was to die shortly after retriving the actual locket of Salazar Slytherin. As it was, Regulus Black was killed shortly after attemping to flee the Death Eaters. Another seemingly unspotted clue would be that, and I quote, "...and also a heavy locket that none of them could open...", from HPATOOTP, which resided in the Black household at that time. Perhaps Regulus stowed it away in his parents home until he could properly destroy it, and maybe never got the chance.
Andother thing I've been wondering about...what are the remaining Horcruxes? Any ideas? 5/4/2007 6:23 PM | Wonnykins

# re: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

i have this crazy theory that R.A.B, i bet, is the son or daughter of Amy Benson. In Chapter thirteen, the woman at the orphanage, Mrs.Cole, spoke of two children (Amy Benson and Dennis Bishop) who was at the same cave the said horcrux was found by Dumbledore and Harry. Both children came back from that same cave after having been with the young Tom Riddle. They weren't "quite right" as Mrs.Cole described. I think that R.A.B is the magical relation of Amy Benson trying to get revenge on Voldemort for what happeneding to Amy Benson in the cave. Just putting that out there. I dont think J.K.R. would make R.A.B an obvious character we've seen already. 7/13/2007 8:07 PM | Lily

Post a comment





 

Please add 8 and 8 and type the answer here: